By Selling itself as a "documentary" it should have integrity and a question and answer basis - using facts. What the title suggests is prefixed and predestined to play up to myth and sensationalism, all in the name of Info-Tainment. What a load of shit. If your a documentary, you need an open ended question, which you then try to solve, E.G. How safe is your flight? Answer - Very! By calling it Terror in the Skies, there is no mystery to solve other than at what point will I become scared that the next time I fly i will likely to die.
Planes are machines, machines have issues. Man is involved so were always going to have that as a variable. But what the show doesn't demonstrate is how the two work together to solve the issues they create 9,999,999 times out of 10,000,000. For example, the Southwest B737 planes that had a fuselage fracture - didn't crash. They both landed safely. The issue they had was nothing to do with metal fatigue, which was investigated in depth, as even the show acknowledged with the genuine causes found to be a manufacturing fault and a misplaced antenna. So why show the metal fatigue? Well we know why. Have a look at the beautiful views afforded to me on my last Southwest B737-700 flight over Nevada! Thats what they should be showing!
If Channel four, or any other TV Network want to show a proper Aviation based show, be it documentary or just to showcase my interest of a machine that has revolutionized the world, then by all means have a look at the pictures below and on my site
www.plane-sight-images.photoshelter.com
Please tell channel 4 what you think of this awful excuse for a documentary.
Thanks for stopping by - MP
Take off over Zurich in Winter 2013, a beautiful view from a Swiss A320 Airbus. |
G-ISLG of Blue Islands turning onto Runway 09 at Bristol Airport with the Severn Estuary in the background. |
No comments:
Post a Comment